Showing posts with label apparition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label apparition. Show all posts

Thursday, August 27, 2026

The Content of Apparition Sightings Argues Against the Hallucination Explanation

 Humans often report apparition sightings. Skeptics try to explain such sightings as hallucinations. Let us consider what we would expect under the hallucination hypothesis, and compare that to what is observed in apparition sightings. 

Under the hypothesis that apparition sightings are hallucinations, we would expect all of the following things:

(1) It would be just as common, or perhaps even more common, for people to see apparitions of healthy, living people (with years of additional life)  as apparitions of dead people.

(2) It would be just as common for people to see apparitions of animals as apparitions of humans. 

(3) It would be just as common for people outside of reputed haunted places to see apparitions of historical people or celebrities as apparitions of family members or friends. 

(4) It would be just as common for people to see apparitions of lifeless things as apparitions of humans. 

(5) Almost never (except by the most improbable of coincidences) would two or more people report seeing the same apparition. If an apparition was a hallucination caused by some rare brain state, we would not expect so rare a brain state to appear identically to two people, so that they both reported seeing at the exact same an illusory thing (such as the same deceased person). That would be as improbable as two people sleeping together waking up, and both of them reporting that they just had the same dream (such as a dream of a dinosaur roaming about). 

(6) The people who reported apparitions of the deceased would be mainly mentally ill people.

All of these predictions fail to match reality. Let's look at each one. 

Prediction 1: "It would be just as common, or perhaps even more common, for people to see apparitions of healthy, living people (with years of additional life) as apparitions of dead people." Counting the entire lifespan (which often includes sightings of apparitions at the end of life), it is fairly common for people to report seeing an apparition of someone known to be dead. Also, a large class of apparitions consists of cases in which someone reports seeing an apparition of someone who was later found to have died at about the same time, or later found to have been close to death at about the same time. I give very many examples of such apparitions in the series of 16 posts you can read here (you can read all of them by continuing to press Older Posts when you come to the bottom). But it seems to be rare for someone to report an apparition of a living, healthy person who had years of additional lifespan ahead of him. Such cases seem to be many times  less common that apparitions of someone who previously died or died at about the same time the apparition was seen. 

Prediction 2: "It would be just as common for people to see apparitions of animals as apparitions of humans." For a large fraction of people, pets are almost like family members. But it seems to be very rare for someone to report seeing an apparition of a deceased pet. The topic is discussed in the news article below, published after the Society for Psychical Research had published hundreds of accounts of apparitions of humans: 

animal ghosts

We read at the top left a statement that apparitions of animals are very scarce. 

Prediction 3: "It would be just as common for people outside of reputed haunted places to see apparitions of historical people or celebrities as apparitions of family members or friends." In England there are various old castles or old buildings where there are supposedly apparitions of historical figures sometimes seem. Outside of such cases, it seems to be very rare for anyone to see an apparition of a historical figure. 

Under the theory that apparitions are hallucinations, we would expect apparitions of Jesus to be very common in countries where Christianity is predominant. Apparitions of Jesus seem to be very rare for those not being diagnosed with schizophrenia.  The Chronicling America web site allows you to do text searches of American newspapers from 1756 to 1963.  Searching for the phrase "apparition of Jesus" on the Chronicling America web site produces only 11 matches, with only one of the newspaper accounts referring to an apparition of Jesus reported in modern times.  For some reason, searching for the phrase "ghost of Jesus" on this site does not work to find matches of that exact phrase, but instead picks up any page (very many) referring to the Christian Trinity using the older phrasing such as "the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost."

Abraham Lincoln was the most famous US president between 1820 and 1920, but searching for "apparition of Lincoln" on the Chronicling America web site produces no cases of anyone reporting an apparition of Lincoln. Similarly, searching for "apparition of Napoleon" on that site produces no cases of anyone reporting an apparition of Napoleon, merely a few repetitions of someone loosely using the word "apparition" to merely mean a sighting of Napoleon while they were in the presence of the living Napoleon.  Without using such a term, I did find one account of someone claiming to see an apparition of Napoleon. 

By comparison, searching for the phrase "apparition of her husband" produces 45 results, many of which are accounts of people claiming to see apparitions of husbands; and searching for "ghost of her husband" produces 126 matches. 

For example, in one newspaper account we read this:

"Calling together her friends and neighbors, she told them she had just seen an apparition of her husband, who, for two years had been absent In New York. He appeared to her to be lying
in a hospital with one hand covering his breast, and he told her that he had been gravely wounded. The day after she received a cablegram from America Informing her that her husband was
dying, having been stabbed by an emissary of the Black Hand."

Similarly, searching for "apparition of his wife" produces 11 matches, searching for "ghost of his wife" produces 119 matches,  searching for "apparition of his father" produces 20 matches, searching for "ghost  of his father" produces 119 matches, searching for "apparition of his mother" produces 6 matches, searching for "ghost of his mother" produces 58 matches, searching for "apparition of her mother" produces 7 matches,  searching for "apparition of her father" produces 9 matches, searching for "ghost of her father" produces 47 matches, searching for "apparition of his brother" produces 5 matches, searching for "apparition of his sister" produces 5 matches, searching for "apparition of her sister" produces 11 matches, searching for "apparition of his friend" produces 11 matches, searching for "apparition of her friend" produces 7 matches, searching for "ghost of her friend" produces 4 matches, and searching for "ghost of her friend" produces 47 matches.

Clearly Prediction #3 does not match reality. It is very much more common for people to report seeing apparitions of deceased family members or deceased friends (or family members or friends at about the same time they died) than to see apparitions of historical figures or celebrities. 

Prediction #4: "It would be just as common for people to see apparitions of lifeless things as apparitions of humans."  It seems to be extremely rare for anyone to see an apparition of a lifeless thing. Automobiles have long played a central role in the life of Americans. But a search for the phrase "apparition of an automobile" on the Chronicling America web site produces only two matches, both of which refer only to horses being scared by automobiles, not humans reporting an apparition of an automobile. No one ever reports seeing an apparition of an automobile in their house or back yard. 

Prediction #5: "Almost never (except by the most improbable of coincidences) would two or more people report seeing the same apparition."  This prediction fails. There are hundreds of cases of more than one people reporting the sight of the same apparition. Such cases can be examined by using the link here, and continuing to press Older Posts at the bottom right. Among the posts you can read using that link are these:


Prediction #6: "The people who reported apparitions of the deceased would be mainly mentally ill people." There is no evidence that this is the case. The great majority who report seeing an apparition of the deceased are normal people who never previously hallucinated.  I personally have published many posts describing many hundreds of apparition sightings, and I can almost never recall such a reported sighting coming from someone with signs of psychosis. 

The content of apparition sightings (mainly involving either family members or friends who either died earlier or at about the same time as the apparition was seen) argues strongly against the claim that apparition sightings are mainly hallucinations. Apparition sightings are an extremely important clue about the nature of our minds: one of many clues that our minds are not the products of our brains, and that minds can exist outside of bodies.  There are many other types of clues telling us the same thing, clues discussed in the posts of this blog. 

The ignoring of apparition sightings by today's neuroscientists is an example of people senselessly ignoring a very important clue, rather like a trusting wife ignoring the very important clue of strange panties repeatedly found under her bed, panties she does not recognize as her own. Senselessly, today's scientists profess belief in things humans never have observed (such as dark matter, dark energy and synapse-stored memories), while refusing to believe in things (spirits of the deceased) that very many people have claimed to have directly observed. It's as if their inner rule was a senseless and unscientific  rule of "believe as my peers believe, not in proportion to how many observations there were of something." 

AI Echo Chambers

Friday, October 31, 2025

Terminal Lucidity Helps to Discredit Claims That Brains Make Minds

Terminal lucidity is a phenomenon in which some very sick person  believed to be very close to death or with a very damaged brain or demented mind suddenly shows a brief period of intellectual clarity before dying from his disease. This often can occur after a long period of stupor or mental incapacity. 

In a previous post I included an image of a 1936 article mentioning cases of terminal lucidity. I should quote the entire text, particularly for any readers reading this blog in a non-English version (as you can do  using the Translate widget at the top right of this blog). Here is the text of that article, found on page 603 of the September 17, 1936 edition of the journal Light, which you can read here

"In one of his lectures last year to the L.S.A., the Rev. Cruwys Sharland related how a one-time pupil of his, after suffering for many years from disintegration of the brain, when approaching his death, suddenly recovered complete mental control and gave those present a long circumstantial account of a walking tour he had undertaken when quite a boy, in company with Mr. Sharland, then his tutor. Every detail was correct, every fact rightly placed, as Mr. Sharland himself testified. 

Psychica quotes several analogous cases from the German Wahres Leben. A young girl, imbecile for eight years, one morning informed the doctor of the asylum in which she lived that she would die the following night—which she did—and discussed various points with him with full mental awareness. M. Martensen Larsen has recorded the case of an Army doctor confined for homicidal mania, who, just prior to his passing, recovered his sanity and wrote several letters asking the forgiveness of those he had attempted to injure. M. G. W. Surya writes of a friend of his who was summoned to the asylum in which his brother had for years been confined with complete softening of the brain. He found his brother perfectly normal and anxious to make certain suggestions to him. He died the same day, and autopsy revealed that the brain had entirely disintegrated.

How can we account for his complete lucidity before death ? 

Similarly, the well-known Berlin anatomist, Benecke, assured his students that Schinkel, the architect, died in possession of all his faculties, in spite of the fact that his cranium was subsequently proved to have been, ' so to speak, empty.' ” 

We have here not just one but three different cases in which it is stated that someone with the most severe brain damage seemed to gain or have normal mental function shortly before dying. In two cases it is reported that the person acting normally or with normal cognition just before death had the most extreme disintegration or wasting of the brain, leaving basically no brain left. 

At the bottom of page 79 of the book you can read using the link here, we have an account by a person who says this about her grandmother: "An hour before she passed, this old lady suddenly woke up from the stupor that she had been in for six long years." We then hear an account of the grandmother speaking well, and acting as if she saw apparitions of the dead (a common occurrence for the dying, even those without any brain problems). 

On page 410 of the book Irreducible Mind we read this:  

"Myers (1892b) had referred to the 'sudden revivals of memory or faculty in dying persons' (p.316)...The eminent physician Benjamin Rush...observed that 'most of mad people discover a greater or less degree of reason in the last days or hours of their lives' (p. 257). Similarly, in his classic study of hallucinations, Brierre de Boismont (1859) noted that 'at the approach of death we observed that ... the intellect, which may have been obscured or extinguished during many years, is again restored in all its integrity' (p. 236). Flournoy (1903, p. 48) mentioned that French psychiatrists had recently published cases of mentally ill persons who showed sudden improvements in their condition shortly before death. In more recent years, Osis (1961) reported two cases, 'one of severe schizophrenia and one of senility, [in which] the patients regained normal mentality shortly before death' (p. 24)." 

The paper "End-of-Life Experiences and the Dying Process in a Gloucestershire Nursing Home as Reported by Nurses and Care Assistants" is one that reported dreams that seemed to foretell a death, and many other hard-to-explain phenomena.  What is remarkable is the amount of hard-to-explain phenomena reported in such a small facility. Questions were asked of workers in Kingsley House, a small facility handling no more than 31 persons at a time, and reporting only about 13 deaths per year. We read of these results, coming from the ten who responded:

  • "7 reported unconscious or confused residents who unexpectedly became lucid enough just before they died to interact with relatives and carers," a phenomena sometimes called "terminal lucidity."
  • "6 reported dreams that help to prepare for death, and 2 reported dreams or visions that held significant meaning for the dying to help with unfinished business." The "Dreams" section of the paper on page 200 gives several examples, some involving dreams that seemed to foretell a death. 
  • "5 reported the dying seeing dead relatives visiting just before death, and 4 reported the dying seeing dead relatives sitting on or near the bed." This is the well-documented phenomenon called deathbed apparitions or deathbed visions, described in my eight posts here
  • "4 reported the synchronistic appearance of birds or animals around or just before the time of death." 
  • "4 reported a change of room temperature around the time of death," with one saying, "sometimes the room is freezing," and that "at other times it is really, really hot."
  • "3 reported synchronistic events at the time of death, such as clocks stopping and bells ringing in rooms of those who had recently died." Read here for examples of the clock stopping at death phenomenon. 
The year 2021 scientific paper "Spontaneous Remission of Dementia Before Death: Results From a Study on Paradoxical Lucidity" discusses many cases of terminal lucidity.  We read this:

" Detailed case reports of 124 dementia patients who experienced an episode of paradoxical lucidity were received. In more than 80% of these cases, complete remission with return of memory, orientation, and responsive verbal ability was reported by observers
of the lucid episode. The majority of patients died within hours to days after the episode..... More than 80% of the patients in this study appeared to have experienced a full, albeit brief, reversal of often profound cognitive impairment in advanced and end-stage dementia."

In the paper we read this: "Macleod (2009) observed 100 consecutive deaths in a hospice in New Zealand and found six cases of unexpected, spontaneous return of cognitive functions and verbal ability within 48 hr before the death of the patient."

Recently there was published the paper "Terminal Lucidity in a Pediatric Oncology Clinic," which reported some similar cases of terminal lucidity. You can read the full paper here. One or more of the  authors interviewed the physicians involved in the cases.  Before discussing its fascinating account of terminal lucidity in a patient identified as Patient One, I should mention that the term "encephalopathic" typically refers to a severe brain pathology, most often involving a brain infection or a failure of the immune system to protect the brain from infection. In the paper we read this:

"The patient was a three-year-old Hispanic female with prolonged medical treatment history for her diagnosis of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), a complex and often life-threatening medical condition resulting from an uncontrolled and ineffective immune response, leading to extreme inflammation in many organs/tissues. After over a year of intense treatments, she underwent an umbilical cord blood transplant, which is the only known cure for this condition. Unfortunately, the transplant was rejected, and while attempts were made to find another option for a second transplant, she had a re-emergence of her HLH and was admitted to the hospital for chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Despite some initial improvements, she developed progressive organ damage and deterioration over the next several weeks, prompting transfer to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), with worsening liver and pulmonary failure. She became severely jaundiced and encephalopathic, and was no longer speaking, eating, or responding to parents/providers. The ICU physicians were worried that she was an aspiration risk, prompting intensification of Do Not Resuscitate/Do Not Intubate (DNR/DNI) conversations with her parents. As all the known treatments available were exhausted and her condition worsened, the focus shifted to providing palliative care. Although initially resistant, after nearly two weeks of intense conversations with parents (including family members and a Catholic priest) and further deterioration in their daughter’s condition, a DNI and modified DNR status change was agreed. That evening, the patient awoke and asked for her usual comfort items (i.e., Lion King movie, parents, toys) and food. She showed no indication of mental impairment and regained the ability to sit up in bed and participate in coloring and other simple age-appropriate tasks. She spoke using logical, organized full sentences, and had multiple conversations with her parents that evening, which they and the bedside nurse described as 'like a miracle.' During the conversations with her parents, she reviewed all the important people in her life and prayed for them. She indicated awareness of transitioning to death and reassured loved ones of the need not to be concerned about her. She also seemed to be communicating with people who were not visible to others. After several hours, she asked to 'go to bed' and returned to her comatose state. During the next 24-48 hours, she never awoke again, and she ultimately died peacefully of cardiac arrest in her parents’ arms."

We also read in the new paper of a Patient Three:

"The patient was a 19-month-old boy who underwent a bone marrow transplant at 16 months of age for ill-defined immune deficiency. He was recovering with typical transplant complications until he developed fevers and progressive neurologic symptoms with loss of ability to communicate, loss of motor function, and loss of cognition.... Prior to the lucid event, he was not responding to healthcare providers and was giving parents only minimal response/eye contact. Three days prior to his death, he became much more alert and interactive, in stark contrast to his steady decline of the prior three months, which was preceded by his parents having decided they would not proceed with further life-saving medical interventions (i.e., surgeries, intubation, etc.). He was noted to be able to move, talk, eat, and communicate for 24-48 hours prior to a rapid decline and death. On the night before his death, he communicated with his parents that he 'was ready to go home' and that 'he and parents would be OK' using verbal and sign language. He talked about joining his brother who was a still-birth, and he told his parents he was going to be fine. Subsequently, he returned to severe mental impairment and died within 24 hours."

No such thing as terminal lucidity should occur if your brain was producing your mind. Once a mind-producing brain had deteriorated, such a deterioration would be irreversible. A brain producing a mind would no more suddenly restore itself than a book missing many of its pages would suddenly restore such pages. 

Cases such as these are hints that the brain is not the source of the human mind. They are part of a very large body of evidence that minds can operate normally when brains have undergone the most severe damage. Countless other cases are discussed in my posts you can read here and here. Such cases are only some of the innumerable reasons for rejecting the dogma that the brain is the source of the human mind. When studying such cases and reasons (discussed in the most voluminous detail in the posts of this blog), we should remember: nature never told us that brains make minds. It was merely professors who told us that, jumping to conclusions that were never warranted by observations. 

Postscript: In the paper here, we have an account of terminal lucidity. We read this:

"We provide biographical background information about the two principal witnesses who reported this case. It concerns the death of Anna Katharina Ehmer, a 26-year-old woman with severe mental disabilities who lived in an institution for people with mental disorders, and who had allegedly never spoken a single word during her life. Yet, she was reported to have sung dying songs for a half hour before she died."